Skip to content

Why Arsenal turned to Guimaraes and prioritised Konsa

Arsenal

BBC Sport's account explains how price, availability and Arteta's preferences shaped Arsenal's deals for Bruno Guimaraes and Ezri Konsa.

Editorial graphic: Why Arsenal turned to Guimaraes and prioritised Konsa. Not a photograph of this event.
Editorial graphic, not a photograph of this event. Background: Volksparkstadion, Hamburg, 2017 · Mario Klassen (CC0), cropped and tinted. Club marks identify the subjects of this report.
Text size

In short

Arsenal's shortlist of more than 20 players gave way to specific recruitment choices shaped by availability, price and Arteta's preferences, according to BBC Sport. Bruno Guimaraes became the midfield priority by mid-June, while Ezri Konsa was the first-choice defensive option. The account explains the considerations behind their signings without establishing an overall verdict on the summer.

Arsenal assembled a summer transfer shortlist of more than 20 players, according to Sami Mokbel's BBC Sport report, with availability, price and Arteta's preferences helping shape their eventual deals for Bruno Guimaraes and Ezri Konsa.

Mokbel describes ambitious recruitment plans and an optimistic Arsenal entering the window as Premier League champions. His account traces two different selection processes: Guimaraes becoming the midfield focus and Konsa holding first-choice status in defence.

Guimaraes emerged as Arsenal's midfield priority

Arsenal explored Guimaraes' former Newcastle team-mate Sandro Tonali and Bournemouth's Alex Scott among their midfield options, BBC Sport reports. Numerous factors, including availability and price, made those potential signings difficult. Tonali joined Spurs for a minimum £92m, a figure that illustrates the cost attached to one of the alternatives.

By mid-June, Guimaraes had emerged as Arsenal's primary focus. Mokbel reports that the midfielder had universal backing inside the Emirates, giving his candidacy a clear basis of internal support as the club narrowed its attention.

Arsenal subsequently signed Guimaraes from Newcastle United for £75m, according to the report. Mokbel characterises him as their most eye-catching signing.

The analytical distinction is between exploring a player and making him the priority. In this account, the difficulties surrounding alternatives sit alongside support for Guimaraes himself; price alone does not explain the choice.

Konsa's versatility matched Arteta's preferences

Konsa was viewed internally as Arteta's first-choice defensive option, Mokbel reports. Arteta wanted players accustomed to the demands of Premier League football, placing experience of the competition among the considerations shaping recruitment.

Arsenal also considered signing an orthodox right-back, with Ivan Fresneda among the options. According to BBC Sport, Konsa's versatility was a key factor in the decision. That adds a positional consideration to the reported preference for Premier League experience.

The negotiations still required movement on the fee. A week before the Konsa deal was confirmed, Arsenal made a £40m offer that was rejected, the report says.

Mokbel attributes to unnamed sources the claim that the ownership at both clubs eventually sealed the deal. The reported agreement was £51m, with £4m in add-ons.

Berta's negotiating approach adds context

Mokbel also reports that Berta regularly uses intermediaries to conduct negotiations, with varying degrees of success. That provides context for the process through which recruitment choices become agreements.

As analysis, the breadth of Arsenal's shortlist indicates the range of options under consideration; it does not establish how many deals were achievable. The decisions around Guimaraes and Konsa explain specific recruitment choices without settling the broader judgement on Arsenal's summer.

Sources

Reporting used to verify this article.

  1. Arsenal had more than 20 players on shortlist to capitalise on title win - BBC Sport Football

Produced with AI assistance from the reporting linked above. How we publish.

Suggest a correction →

Discussion

Be the first to comment

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this article. Start the conversation!