Skip to content

Leah Williamson penalty: BBC's reasoning and Arsenal's restart dispute

Arsenal

Why BBC considers Leah Williamson's handball penalty correct, and how Arsenal's account of a rolling ball challenges the goal-kick explanation.

Football photograph: Leah Williamson 20181009.
Open-license editorial photo via Wikimedia Commons · EL Loko · CC BY 4.0 Original photo ↗
Text size

In short

Leah Williamson conceded a handball penalty as Arsenal drew 2-2 with Paris FC. BBC Sport considers the decision correct because it treats Misa Rodriguez's pass as a completed goal-kick. Arsenal assistant Aaron D'Antino recalled the ball still rolling, a material disagreement because the cited restart guidance requires it to be stationary.

Leah Williamson conceded a handball penalty that allowed Paris FC to equalise in their 2-2 draw with Arsenal, according to BBC Sport. Its assessment that the decision was correct turns on whether the preceding goal-kick had put the ball into play.

BBC reports that, after the ball went out for a goal-kick, Arsenal goalkeeper Misa Rodriguez played a quick, short pass to Williamson. The defender stretched out her arm to stop the ball and position it so she could take the goal-kick herself.

Williamson was penalised for handball, and Mendy scored the resulting penalty to bring Paris FC level. The restart therefore had a direct consequence for the score.

Why BBC considers the Williamson penalty correct

The goal-kick guidance reproduced by BBC under Law 16 sets out the relevant conditions: if the ball is stationary within the goal area and a defending player kicks it, the goal-kick is considered taken. That wording applies to a kick by any defending player.

In BBC's account, the ball was still and on the field when Rodriguez passed it. The report consequently treats her pass as the goal-kick. On that reading, Williamson was handling a ball already in play while attempting to prepare her own restart.

BBC also cites Law 12's provision that deliberately touching the ball with a hand or arm is an offence. The penalty consequence follows if a handball offence happens after the ball is in play and inside the kicker's penalty area. Together, those provisions explain BBC's reasoning, conditional on its account of the restart.

Arsenal dispute whether the ball was stationary

Arsenal assistant coach Aaron D'Antino gave a different recollection, as reported by BBC: he remembered the ball still rolling. That conflicts with the report's description of a stationary ball when Rodriguez played it, and concerns a condition expressly included in the goal-kick guidance.

Analytically, this is the material distinction between the two accounts. The stationary-ball requirement is part of the explanation for treating Rodriguez's pass as a completed restart; D'Antino's recollection challenges that factual starting point. BBC's conclusion therefore depends on which description applies.

D'Antino's proposed response focused on the transfer of the ball to Williamson. He suggested that the lesson might be how Arsenal get it to her, so they avoid putting themselves in that situation. His emphasis was on the practical preparation for the goal-kick.

Sources

Reporting used to verify this article.

  1. Why penalty for Williamson handball was correct call - BBC Sport Football

Produced with AI assistance from the reporting linked above. How we publish.

Suggest a correction →

Discussion

Be the first to comment

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this article. Start the conversation!